Why is Te not assertiveness in Socionics?

First of all, let's look into what assertiveness is as a term:

Having or showing a confident and forceful personality. (Google search).

Now, let's go back to Socionics.

Socionics Te is not "assertiveness", because being assertive is a behavioural trait, first of all, that is based on psychological personal qualities - psychological states of the person.

Recalling the theory, Te is anything within the field of practical logic and how to do things - making tech related things or business related things, starting from simple practical actions as making coffee or cleaning stains on clothes, ending with complex technological processes like repairing PCs or dealing with economical processes.

Having assertiveness as we already looked into briefly, goes back to self-confidence that's a personal psychological attitude, but it's not that simple and exclusive to psychology! Because we are adding an information element of Socionics to it and as result this personal attitude and information element that's Se forms this concept.

Se (Black Sensing) = static external form, state, qualities & resources of physical power fields or objects/people, of difference in them and of power of one thing and another. 

This difference shows the reason why Te is not about being assertive, not only because it's a psychological thing, but also from Socionics perspective of adding IMEs (information elements). 

Explaining the possible assertive nature of Te leads in some examples:

  • Both Te leads have Se - one has 2 Dimensional valued (LIE, Gamma quadra), other one has 4 Dimensional unvalued, but strong (LSE, Delta quadra);
  • Because of this, both are capable of telling the external static qualities of the field or the object, each to their Dimensionality; as well as their own static qualities and if they see themselves having the resources and by comparing they see the possibility to win (overpower by the hoarded information Se + Logics Macroaspect (Te+Ti)), they will be assertive;
It's important to note the difference in-between information elements and their interconnected work aspects within the blocks of type's IMEs (Te + valued Se or Te + strong 4D Se) and to tell the difference in-between them, to avoid naming a certain trait to an Information element that does not have this information in the spectrum of its possible variations.

Komentāri

Ierakstīt komentāru

Šī emuāra populārākās ziņas

Comparison of LII and ILI.

Attēls
The descriptions go by listing and comparing the mentioned SAME elements of both types that are each in their own stack, the ones listed in the correct 1-8 placement are LIIs. LII Ti leading + Ne creative and creates a value that makes LII consider multiple options/alternatives/ways, and not only consider, but making it in general a very open-minded individual type. Ti creates abstract logical constructs about static existing things - not "how the world works", but "how the world IS", Ne Creative amplifies the position of Ti into multitudes and constant tendency for "what ifs" which makes LII a very philosophical thinker that can evaluate many alternate possibilities. ILI Ti demonstrative and Ne restrictive creates unvalued positions that help ILIs main purpose elements - Te practical logic aka "how the world WORKS" a dynamic aspect and adds static Ti information to conclude this macroaspect of Logic that is very strong in ILI individuals; Ne r...
Lasīt vairāk

Element descriptions in short.

Socionics is a calculation of information elements presented in individuals speech patterns. Each element determines a type of information. Individuals psyche "absorbs" the information from external surroundings such as when we read, speak, observe, etc. When the individual is subjected to typing process, their speech is being analysed and that way we can see the elements in speech patterns. Here is a short description of each element and how by what they determine we can detect them in speech. Ni - determining patterns in any happenings, observing things in time flow, dynamic and sees what is changing and how, talks about times and patterns changes between them and all encompassing things, sees the big picture, predicts the outcome based on collecting patterns in time. Speaks about how things changed, mentions time and patterns, mentions history and things from abstract interpretations of time flow or how things change in metaphors. Ne - determining the new, options and poss...
Lasīt vairāk

Suguru Geto - a fanatic of meanings from Alpha quadra?

Attēls
We can see that many point out how Suguru Geto from the worldwide top list manga and anime - Jujutsu Kaisen - is LII, an Alpha quadra Logic type, attributing fanatism of meanings. To add a perspective, I would say that not as much because of fanatism about meanings, because they certainly can, in Alpha quadra - through Ne Ti seek the "meaning of whole construct for the sake of analysis and search of different truth/s", however -  where are his Alpha quadra values? Where in particular is Se PoLR?  He doesn't seem to have it. What Geto displays is dynamic Se Te value axis. If anything, he uses Te practical/technology of actions knowledge and strategic analysis (people can watch him in fights) in order to overpower the other. He also pays a decent amount of Si based stuff on Ni axis of time "you seem tired Gojo, you have used infinity for x hours straight" Si - Ni. Conscious. He also concentrates on power schemes, when he breached the edge and took the stage of cul...
Lasīt vairāk